Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Head Ski Resort
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. Mailer Diablo 04:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable ski resort OhNoitsJamieTalk 04:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I nominated it as I would an individual (non-famous) restuarant or hotel. However, I see now that there are quite a few ski resort articles in existence. I'm unable to find a specific policy that fits well. OhNoitsJamieTalk 07:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article I wrote about Brian Head Ski Resort in southern Utah was tagged for deletion by OhNoItsJamie about an hour ago. I find it rather unfair that he referenced Wikipedia notability criteria in his given reason for the tagging. There is no notability precedent for ski resorts or anything similar, and as far as general notability goes, I find that this resort probably passes muster, seeing as a Google search will reveal several unaffiliated webpages written about the resort.Brillemeister 05:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete*Google turns up 60,000 results between "Brian Head Resort" or "Brian Head Ski Resort" including mentioning on Utah.com among other replace.However, I don't see any evidence of notability which would most reasonably be determined by WP:CORP which this seems to fail. JoshuaZ 05:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep per Hetar (especially it being the highest elevation resort in the state which is a pretty unique/notable property). JoshuaZ 07:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Brill. Arbusto 06:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: 60,000 google hits is enough for me. Besides that, its Utah's highest-elevation resort, was the location for a recent missing skier situation, and is probably the most significant resort in southern Utah, an area known internationally for its national parks and outdoor activities. Plus, with Utah's reputation (or slogan) for the "greatest snow on earth" I think most ski resorts in the state qualify for notability. --Hetar 07:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Clear and present keep, as per the many many ski resorts we have articles on. Real place, real community of interest, real people hurtling downhill. Grutness...wha? 09:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this looks notable. --Terence Ong 10:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep A ski resort is notable, any ski resort is. Ski resorts are places that people come to from all over the world. The fact that I live in California, and have heard of this ski area means that it is notable. Tobyk777 07:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.