Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Doerner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed deletion. Redirect at editors' discretion. Sandstein 12:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Doerner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable drummer that has been a stand-in on a number of occasions for Helix (band) and who plays in a Supertramp covers band. Karst (talk) 09:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Searches found nothing more than a few mentions, not even generally notable for the guidelines (GNG). SwisterTwister talk 07:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If he was a significant member of one notable band we would likely redirect. If he was a significant member of two notable bands we would like keep (and trim to sourced content). He seems to have been a significant member of both Helix ([1]) and Saga, so I would favour the latter option. --Michig (talk) 09:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would support a redirect to Helix. It appears that for health reasons he was unable to make a significant contribution to Saga, who also appear the have been going through a number of line-up changes in the six years that he was in the band. As per usual, searching for sources in relation to drummers is proving difficult. In that sense, it fails WP:GNG. Karst (talk) 10:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.