Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Cain (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Cain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article based primarily on self-published sources. There are several "sources" provided, but most are only to self-published stuff. The Cal State source doesn't even mention the article subject, let alone cover him in depth, and I see no indication that the "Quarterback Ranch" source is particularly reliable, it appears rather to be promotional/sales material. A search doesn't turn up any better references, just self-published stuff and Amazon links. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agreed, overly promotional. Jeff Quinn (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, once again, overly promotional. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 02:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 02:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 02:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Enough is enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, heavily promotional, no actual notability evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pure promotionalism, no evidence of notability. Salting sounds like a good idea. – Joe (talk) 10:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable individual with no coverage in mainstream publications. Article created by a new user with no other edit history. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.