Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Buerck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Buerck[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for an Ohio political consultant that fails WP:NPOL. A further search turned up passing references but not enough to establish WP:GNG, especially for people that work in the political field. GPL93 (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Political consultants can get Wikipedia articles if they can be sourced well enough to clear WP:GNG, but are not automatically entitled to have articles just because their own firm's self-published web presence offers technical verification that they exist. The references here are not GNG-supporting journalism about Brett Buerck, however: one is the firm's routine entry in a business directory, and the other is its own press release about itself, and these are not notability-supporting sources. Bearcat (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.