Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Anthony Middlin (aka BAM)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per SNOW. While it could go a bit longer following the relist, there's no dissent and this could be a 7 day PROD StarM 02:00, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Anthony Middlin (aka BAM)[edit]

Contested prod. Non-notable candidate for political office. WP:BIO/WP:POLITICIAN. CultureDrone (talk) 14:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no independent source for notability. Also fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:MUSIC--Boffob (talk) 19:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a vanity article. MuZemike (talk) 02:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lots of unsourced nonsense. And his alleged political exploits are non-notable. TheFeds 05:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient RS. Icewedge (talk) 07:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not supported by RS. Just being a candidate for local office doesn't establish notability either. • Gene93k (talk) 08:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Local government losers are not notable per WP:POLITICIAN. Seems to be nothing more than a vanity article. WWGB (talk) 12:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete failed candidate who came in fifth for local office... need I say more? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is that a snowflake I see? Tavix (talk) 23:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete I can find no reliable sources about this individual at all. Google news returns a whopping 0 hits. Not even a single passing mention. Also note that in the very unlikely event that this article is kept it should be moved to just Brett Anthony Middlin since there is no one else of that name. JoshuaZ (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.