Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Alegre-Wood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 00:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Alegre-Wood[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He gives a lot of interviews, to get PR for his company. No reason why we should add to it. No other notability. See the linked articles Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Property Club & Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 3+1 Plan DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is no consensus that interviews help estabilish notability (see Wikipedia talk:Interviews), so - with no clearly reliable sources showing the subjects notability - I agree this is a promo piece that needs to go. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still certainly hinting at promotional, there's nothing minimally suggestive of better and nothing at all convincing. Overall information is still not helping for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't really find anything to show that he's notable enough for an article. I'm one of the people that do think that interviews could be used to establish notability, depending on the interview. If he's just getting brought in to ask questions about a general topic then no - that wouldn't be usable. In these interviews the answerer is fairly replacable with anyone that is knowledgeable about the topic. If he's answering questions about himself, his company, or his book, then those could count, as long as it's in a RS. However I've found nothing to suggest that he's received this type of interview in a place Wikipedia would consider to be reliable and the impression I get is that his interviews are the former - he comes in to talk about things, but he's not the focus of attention. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:34, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable writer and promoter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just promotion. Google search came up with no notable media companies.Simplespeed4ce (talk) 03:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.