Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan O'Reilly (MMA)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan O'Reilly (MMA)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

MMA fighter with only one top tier fight (a loss). It's WP:CRYSTALBALL to assume he'll get the other two top tier fights he needs to meet WP:NMMA. No objection to recreating the article when he meets WP:NMMA. Mdtemp (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 18:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 18:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nominator. The proposed second top tier fight really is too far in the future to be sure.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fought in the Ultimate Fighter as well as the UFC. Subject of independent articles. CrazyAces489 (talk) 06:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Having lost his only one top tier fight, he's a long way from having the three top tier fights he needs to meet WP:NMMA. If he gets those fights his article can be recreated. Appearing on TUF is not, in itself, an indicator of notability. Papaursa (talk) 17:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails both WP:NMMA and WP:GNG. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.