Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Graham Dempsey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Graham Dempsey[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NAUTHOR. I am unable to find significant discussion of the individual in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 16:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 16:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 16:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Support inclusion and reject deletion: The subject of this article is notable, since he has published several books and has appeared in many podcasts and videos. The article includes some unnecessary biographical information in the Academic Studies. That section should probably be removed.Brandonlee25 (talk) 00:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete The sourcing is a mix of non-RS and primary sources including student newsletters, the subject's own works, and podcast interviews. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - initially impressive number of references does not stack up to more detailed scrutiny, as per GPL93 above. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:53, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator and GPL93.4meter4 (talk) 15:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Masterhatch (talk) 23:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.