Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Weiler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Weiler[edit]

Brenda Weiler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable independent musician that fails WP:MUSICBIO. I've been able to find three sources about her, [1], [2], and [3]. The first two are just interviews with local newspapers about the upcoming release of one of her albums, and the third one is about a yoga studio she owns. (Also, source 2 was published on 9/11, which I thought was interesting) - Poydoo can talk and edit 17:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - Poydoo can talk and edit 17:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. - Poydoo can talk and edit 17:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. - Poydoo can talk and edit 17:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- does not meet required criteria. Google search offers almost nothing, besides some promotional sites.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 21:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 10:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. There is no coverage available for this particular individual to warrant a Wikipedia article. NagalimNE (talk) 16:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unsourced BLP. scope_creepTalk 08:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.