Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Ntambirweki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Ntambirweki[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NBIO. All of the sources except for the Observer interview are not independent. The events described in the interview are unlikely to pass the notability threshold. 1292simon (talk) 08:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as written. Nothing here rises to the level of encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 14:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WesSirius (talk) 03:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What criteria did 1292simon use to determine that Uganda's top two publishers by circulation, reach or revenue are "not independent". Do you want to tell me any random Ugandan can get published in all three of our top newspapers? The subject has sufficient notoriety to be published in three of our top media houses, has been recognised multiple times as a top legal mind from our country. I really do not understand your campaign targeted to this particular article.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.