Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Destiny Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as hoax per WP:CSD#G3. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Destiny Williams[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy: Blatant hoax. According to the article creator (likely one of several socks promoting this person through several articles), this person is a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue covermodel, a Victoria's Secret Angel, Vogue model, and Playboy Playmate (at the age of 16), which would make her one of the most successful models of the age. It's all very impressive except for that none of the templates at the bottom of the page back it up and no internet source has ever heard of her. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 17:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as vandalism in the form of a hoax, and as a second choice delete for being an extremely poorly written hoax: "There was only 1 month later and in 2006 was to parade in December through the gateway of the company, the following year his uncle Hugh Hefner, I call to your cell phone to tell her fence to be submitted to the Playboy Mansion." --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, incoherent, unverifiable, and I'm pretty sure US law forbids pornography portraying 16 year olds... Hairhorn (talk) 18:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.