Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breastberry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Breastberry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Word coined by a poet without a Wikipedia article. Fails WP:NEO. Delete, speedy if possible. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism. As usual I will add that there needs to be a speedy category for blatantly non-notable neologisms. Hairhorn (talk) 20:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete per WP:NEO. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:SNOWy delete there isn't a chance in hell this will be kept. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 15:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Neologism that does not appear to be in use anywhere. -- Whpq (talk) 18:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.