Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakfast with Einstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Breakfast with Einstein

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, no independent coverage, does not meet WP:NF, deproded with no explanation nor improvement BOVINEBOY2008 11:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for films.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Despite being associated with notable individuals, the film appears to have generated little to no interest. I agree. It just isn't notable. Deletion is absolutely the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article also fails WP:GNG, since there are barely any notable sources available. JTZegers (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; fails WP:NF and WP:GNG; no indication of notability. Ahmad^talk 06:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a dog of a film, pardon the pun. No coverage at all. Bearian (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.