Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bratz Girlz Really Rock
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete - WP:V. It can come back if/when there's actually something like verifiability or reliable sources. Black Kite 23:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bratz Girlz Really Rock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Zero information. Google is inconclusive and suggests this may actually be an upcoming video game and not a movie. Either way, it's crystalballery. JuJube (talk) 06:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sourced It does appear to be a movie, as evidenced by this cinema page and is availiable to pre-order on DVD. Searching for "Bratz Girlz Really Rock" (with quotes) returns 55,200 GHits. If nothing else IGN has a feature on the game which says it's based on an "upcoming doll line and animated movie of the same name" which could be used to flesh out the article. -- JediLofty UserTalk 07:46, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 08:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Week keep if article is expanded and sourced. the information is out there.[1] Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A lack of sources is a cleanup issue unless the sources simply do not exist (at which point it is a WP:V issue). Notability appears to be established. Also, WP:CRYSTAL is not a blanket prohibition of articles covering things in the future. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:29, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Umm...there also appears to be an article on Bratz: Girlz Really Rock. That page is a hot mess, but that's not really my point. Anyway, can't these two pages be merged to reflect the direct-to-dvd movie and soundtrack? I don't think it's notable enough to warrant two separate pages. Specifically regarding this release, it's just yet another DVD movie, not really notable on its own merits. (As opposed to which title it's really under, and how the redirects would work, I have absolutely no idea.) SKS2K6 (talk) 00:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I just realised that the OTHER page was fake. Anyway, in terms of the nominator's points, there is information out there (here's the press release) so it's not really crystal ballery. To me, it comes down to whether or not a direct-to-video release is notable enough for its own Wikipedia page, especially in light of the numerous other ones. I would have to say it's a weak keep for now, although I think that one page should suffice for the video game and the film (and the soundtrack, if it's legitimate). SKS2K6 (talk) 00:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reliable, third-party sources. Stifle (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.