Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brasserie Julien

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brasserie Julien

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a former PROD nomination. My PROD rationale stated "Non-notable restaurant, no coverage other than restaurant reviews. The venue has been closed for at least two years." (I determined this by using the Wayback Machine to look at archived pages of the restaurant's web page and the last version where their website existed was January 2013.) All the citations are restaurant reviews, there's no in-depth coverage that would make the restaurant notable enough for a Wikipedia article in my opinion. Fails WP:CORP. Diannaa (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Subject is notable, [1], [2], PROD deletions are for non-controversial deletes which sourced articles do not fall under. The two sources I've included are not included in the article. Notability is not temporary closed restuarant can be notable. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 04:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Found two book sources [3] it was also covered in Best Food Writing 2003. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 06:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. The linked reviews + travel guide mention seem sufficient for a restaurant. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now if at all even though I'm weak keep and was mixed what to type here but as there's no further coverage and it appears closed, there are no signs of improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches did not reveal enough to show this restaurant meets the WP:GNG criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Subject is notable with good inline citations. Delmonico's and other defunct restaurants are still kept.--DThomsen8 (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Formerly a notable eatery and entertainment venue. Many things in the world have ceased to exist, countries, companies, organisations, people. That is what history is and why they are in an encyclopaedia. Richard Harvey (talk) 17:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as appears notable. --Rubbish computer 22:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.