Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branza de Cernique

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 22:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Branza de Cernique

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A short article in Romanian about a type of cheese. Was first tagged for speedy deletion as a hoax by a different editor. In contesting the deletion, the author denied it was a hoax, but admitted it was a little known product, stating on the article's talk page:

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because there is a local cheese that is named Cernique Cheese. It is selled only localy so is very little known.

So the author is acknowledging there is no notability in the product. On that basis I proposed deletion via PROD, but the author then removed that template. So here we are, a non-English article about an admitted non-notable subject. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 13:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not English and if it is "very little known", we can safely assume that there are no WP:GNG-compliant sources to back up anything, leaving us with an unverifiable stub. Having only 4 hits in a regular Google search (all of them Wikipedia or mirrors) is only more evidence of its non-notability. - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Delete Erm, a Romanian language article in the English Wikipedia? And I also found no sources at all. Fails WP:GNG. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I would've frankly PRODed, nothing at all convincing. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.