Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Scott[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. I have opted not to nominate this autobiography for speedy deletion because I would like to know if the Queen's Venturer Award meets the requirements set out in WP:ANYBIO#1. I'm not familiar with the scouting community, and am unsure if a scouting award is 'significant' by Wikipedia standards. There seems to be no other reliable claim to notability here; the website for Fuse-It Media seems to be down, and there are no references here that are not affiliated with the subject in some way. Also, does a vector drawing count as an image of the subject? You know, unless he's Tron or Max Headroom or something. Steamroller Assault (talk) 17:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'll expand later if necessary but basically their does not seem to be an reliable, independent coverage of this individual and per Wikipedia:Verifiability "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.". Guest9999 (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG - Only coverage in third party sources is trivial. Reso lute 01:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep the Queen's Venturer Award is very significant within the Scouting community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon.scott.101 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet the notability guidelines. Lustralaustral (talk) 21:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.