Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Reynolds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 05:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Reynolds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply a PR business listing and, like anything, we have to consider the likeliness of paid advertising, what's here is simply not establishing genuine independent notability and substance and it's quite noticeable which sources are these are exact PR; searches are not finding anything of actual convincing and it's these cases that we apply WP:NOT. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As per nom, seems to be purely promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional page, vanity listing. reddogsix (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with ST's assessment on this one. Promotional article. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Blatantly promotional. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 22:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete although there are small mentions in some news items, this character is not independently notable apart from Sociabl. The do seem to be several criminals and officials that use the name Brandon Reynolds that compete for hist on Google search and news. So just merge the sourcable bits to Sociabl. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough IRS, and looks like just way TOOSOON (suspect there will probably be an article here one day). Merge the Sociabl section over to Sociabl. Aoziwe (talk) 12:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.