Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brand Zeitgeist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brand Zeitgeist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. This book fails Wikipedia:Notability (books). De728631 (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability of the book; published by iUniverse.com, which describes itself as a "self-publishing company". AllyD (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can turn up no relevant coverage to suggest this book's been reviewed, awarded, added to curricula, adapted into a film, or otherwise covered in third party sources at all (provisions of WP:N/Books). Gonzonoir (talk) 15:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.