Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrandActive
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- BrandActive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page reads like an advertisement which I can deal with. Unfortunately, I am unable to find anything in-depth I can use to clean it up. A search found nothing to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and therefore page fails WP:ORG. CNMall41 (talk) 00:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete obvious WP:PROMOTION; also fails GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 01:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as spam. No indications of notability or significance either. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.