Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braffrock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete with no prejudice against creating a redirect to a suitable target. — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 22:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Braffrock[edit]

Non-notable neologism. Oli Filth 00:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Spring Rubber 00:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found this term mentioned on Pitchfork ([[1]]) and came here to see what was meant by the term. I hope someone can find a source to cite for the exact definition, but this article is not useless. NeilDespres 01:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Pitchfork be damned, it has 18 G-hits. Eighteen. If nothing else, the guys at Pitchfork made it up on the spot and it would still be a neo/protologism. Incidentally, "Braff rock" has about 150. Axem Titanium 04:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- while it may be useful, it's still a non-notable neologism. --Haemo 05:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- If anything the article should forward to "Braff rock," with content preserved --Christopher Lame 14:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just throwing this out there: how about making the article a redirect to Garden State (soundtrack)? Zagalejo 20:03, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It only has 18 Google hits. Non-notable neologism, has not reached the mainstream yet. Neranei (talk) 18:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable neologism. Nuttah68 14:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.