Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Young (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Young (ice hockey)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has played 43 games in the AIHL, the highest level of competition for the sport in Australia and has been a member of the national team, competing in a World Championship. Dan arndt (talk) 08:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Drastically fails GNG. Even using keywords on searches to sort out all the others of the same name gives me nothing but stats pages. Fails NHOCKEY by playing in an amateur league that has not been proven to meet GNG consistently and in the third and second tier of the IIHF tournaments. Yosemiter (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 talk contribs 00:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 06:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete They have never played at any significant level of competition and there is no where near enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Deadman137 (talk) 04:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.