Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley S. Leavitt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley S. Leavitt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsuccessful candidate for an election, no other claim to notability. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 03:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Consensus is that defeated house of representative contestants with no other coverage are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unelected candidates do not get articles just for being candidates, and this makes no credible claim that he has preexisting notability for anything else. Bearcat (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete coverage of his candidacy was surprisingly intense and in-depth, hard-fought primary for the right to challenge a popular incumbent, the fact that he was an actual steelworker, but all coverage was all campaign-related and regional.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and above editors. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.