Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Barraclough
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bradley Barraclough[edit]
- Bradley Barraclough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD, reason given was that he was "notable for college soccer career". However, he still fails WP:NFOOTY as he has not played at a fully-professional level of football. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of any significant media coverage beyond WP:ROUTINE and WP:NTEMP. --Jimbo[online] 11:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --Jimbo[online] 11:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 11:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. College football is not fully pro, meaning he fails WP:NSPORT, and there is no indication of significant coverage, so fails WP:GNG as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 17:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There are two problems here. First of all, NCAA teams are not professional clubs so they should only be included in the youth section. Second of all, this page doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG. Therefore, this page needs to be trashed. Delete. – Michael (talk) 20:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.