Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braden Detelich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:58, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Braden Detelich

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible COI author, and notability for a BLP XyzSpaniel Talk Page 20:38, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - AfC submission was declined on multiple occasions for lack of reliable sources (see Draft:Braden_Detelich), and author (whose username would suggest is the subject) has apparently now simply recreated it in mainspace. Yes, the Chicago Tribune reference is reliable, but only includes a passing mention of the subject, so fails to provide significant coverage. This article also fails to avoid original research, as the author actually listed "Discussion with Braden Detelich" as a reference. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I wish him luck on his self-promotional campaign, but he will have to do it elsewhere. WP:PROMOTION. No evidence to be found for any sort of independent notability via significant coverage in reliable sources. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity article. Sources pertaining to music are self-downloads. Sources pertaining to gymnastics are routine and trivial and fail to pass GNG. ----

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.