Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradden Inman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a recreation of an article deleted following a deletion discussion, that failed to address reasons for deletion. Skomorokh 23:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bradden Inman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails notability at WP:ATH and WP:GNG Steve-Ho (talk) 18:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not give it a few months? I know technically he dosn't qualify, but even if he dasn't played any league games yet the odds are he soon will do. RicoRichmond (talk) 18:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read WP:CRYSTAL. If he hasn't played yet, it's too early to have this article, and you can't necessaily prove when he might play. Delete. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 20:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted content, no more notable than last time this article was deleted. Deletion w/o prejudice to recreation if and when he makes a first-team appearance. Bencherlite ^Talk 22:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete agree with Bencherlite's comments. It seems highly likely that he will become notable but he's not there yet and we can't jump the gun. Cazort (talk) 00:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. This guy fails WP:ATHLETE by a mile, and even in NUFC's threadbare state he is not likely to get a game this season barring a major swine flu outbreak, even in the Carling Cup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MickMacNee (talk • contribs)
Speedy delete under WP:CSD G4. Nothing has changed since the last AfD to make the subject of the article notable. --Jimbo^[online] 22:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above Spiderone 12:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL. Rlendog (talk) 19:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.