Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Prefontaine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:09, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Prefontaine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 05:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete neither his role as coach or player rises to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This one seems weak even by Dolovis standards. Does not meet NHOCKEY and not finding significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete: I was thinking exactly like Rlendog; truth be told, I'd support an A7 speedy deletion for failure to make an assertion of notability. The guy played a handful of undistinguished seasons in the low minors. He's been an assistant coach in the semi-pros for a few years. No distinction or hints of one even at those levels. WTH? Ravenswing 23:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:NHOCKEY. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.