Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Daymond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Daymond

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a record producer, with no strong reliable source coverage to carry his notability per WP:NMUSIC. The only sources here are a glancing namecheck of his existence in the very last paragraph of a Billboard article about something else, and a profile in a music directory which contains no actual content to verify anything claimed in this article -- literally all it confirms is his name. As always, a musician is not automatically entitled to an article just because passage of an NMUSIC criterion is claimed -- he gets one when the claim of notability is verified by enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG. Also conflict of interest, as the creator's username was "Riprock22" and the subject's production moniker is Riprock. Bearcat (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As Bearcat identifies, whilst there are claims made in the article which may meet WP:NMUSIC, there is minimal coverage in the sources which I can find to support these claims. As it stands, unless someone else can come up with some better sources than I can, it does not meet WP:NMUSIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.