Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boxbush Meadows

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boxbush Meadows[edit]

Boxbush Meadows (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no notability or significant coverage. I could not find anything about Boxbush Meadows. I am also nominating it because there is only one sentence with no context. I am also nominating Alexanderstone Meadows and Rhos Garth-fawr for deletion. Analog Horror, (Speak) 01:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per my comment there. Part of a batch of mass-produced sub-stubs without evidence of notability. Reywas92Talk 02:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Absolutely nothing here to suggest notability. Dunarc (talk) 16:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Just identify all the ones which can't be expanded and I'll db author them. They were created believing that there were numerous PDFs available for these.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.