Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulevard (lifestyle magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Boulevard (lifestyle magazine)[edit]

Boulevard (lifestyle magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. Was a SPA creation and translated from the French wiki judging by the <<<>>> quotes. The French wiki article was deleted as an advertisement in 2013 [[1]] and a note pasted on this articles talk page. The sources quoted here all refer to it's launch and early life 1990-1992 and smell of a press release. The claim that it found Raper I cannot verify but does not make the magazine notable. It was recently added by a IP SPA probably to support the Fiona Scott Lazareff article which was then at AfD. I can find no other sources beyond those listed in the article - please note there are several other magazines titled Boulevard. The claim in the article that it created the Bal des Debutantes is disputed on the French wiki deletion discussion and our own wiki page. The source which is given for the foreign editions is dated 1992 but the text says between 1992 and 1995. I think this fails WP:NMAG and WP:GNG Lyndaship (talk) 18:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 14:06, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.