Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boukari Laouali Chaibou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boukari Laouali Chaibou

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like a lot of puffery and few if any real journalistic articles. To start with the end, he has won the "Prix de la plume étendue", which according to the source[1] is the biggest literary prize in Niger, given each year to the best literary work in Niger. Strangely, his book is a non-fiction law book (hardly a literary work), and the award is completely unknown and not given to anyone else, ever, it seems. Despite the many references, seemingly independent reviews of his bestselling book and all discussing the large impact and popularity he already has, it seems that not much interest exists in him otherwise, giving me at least the impression that these interviews and reviews are paid for or otherwise unreliable and not giving any actual notability. Fram (talk) 13:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 14:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just deleted the prize won since it is confusing and you feel that the source and price are not reliable and notorious. Apart from that, I maintain that the article is admissible.@CAPTAIN RAJU@Fram@Shellwood Wikipedien28 (talk) 15:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Due to the issues with the sources identified in the nomination statement. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 11:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.