Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boughton Law Corporation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 21:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Boughton Law Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is apparently a promotional mechanism for an apparently non-notable law firm in Canada. Does not qualify for speedy due to assertion of notability. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Logan Talk Contributions 18:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Logan Talk Contributions 18:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Logan Talk Contributions 18:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. After researching the firm itself, it appears to be nothing more than a full service Vancouver law firm located in Downtown Vancouver, Canada. Stubbleboy 19:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Pretty average law firm, not really exceptional, no reason to be on Wikipedia. Probably put there by an employee to get its name out there on a larger scale. Don't think there will be a huge argument on this one. The answer is pretty obvious. Guyinasuit5517 (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article is a badly written article. I strongly agree with the deletion of this article.
--Rubinkumar (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.