Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bought in

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 18:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bought in[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found this article that had an AfD temp put on it today, but there was no entry attached to it.

I have to say I agree with deleting the article per WP:NOT. I dream of horses (T) @ 20:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Dictionary definition of obscure auction jargon. I can't see how this topic can be covered encyclopedically. Cullen328 (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probably merits a mention in auction or reserve price, but really no reason to have a stand-alone article on it. Qrsdogg (talk) 18:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Not notable, will be in the article auction. Also it is very small and if it wants to stay on wikipedia it needs to be made bigger. Willrocks10 (talk) 11:56, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Hi,

If you give me some time I could find some information for this page. This page could become a very good Wikipedia page. Normally, I find people delete pages without doing any research at all. Please bare with me.

Thanks, pbl1998

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.