Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boronia Boys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boronia Boys[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG SarahStierch (talk) 16:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Assuming I can find sources for both, and that's an if, would it be worthwhile to merge both the first and second films into one article? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tried finding sources for both this and its sequel, but there just isn't enough to merit an article for either of them separately, let alone together. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 21:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The coverage is very sparse. I was not able to find any more than is already identified in the article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.