Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Born Without Bones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Born Without Bones

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since May, no notability presented (ie: no significant coverage in RS) in article and none on WP:BEFORE. No awards, no chart listing/placements. Search actually gives you more articles about people and pets born without bones... Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, United States of America, and Massachusetts. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. The usual spate of WP:ROUTINE coverage and blogposts. (At least these days we're spared Myspace pages.) Ravenswing 19:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Coverage in SPIN should be enough to keep this one. It is a major music magazine. In addition there is album review in Distorted Sound Magazine.Hkkingg (talk) 08:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Interviews of a subject cannot be used to bolster that subject's notability. Nor is notability inherited; a review of an album contributes nothing to the notability of those involved in its production. Ravenswing 15:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Music reviews by independent reliable sources contribute directly to the notability of the band that composed and released the album in the same way that book reviews contribute to the notability of the writer. Also most reviews contain some biographical information as is the case here, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Minorly notable band, represented by a notable label. This kind of band is not uncommon on Wikipedia and, as an inclusionist, I see no reason why it should be removed. PickleG13 (talk)
Keep The article has independent sources with significant coverage on the band. WP:ROUTINE applies notability for events. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 01:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This band appears to have released at least 2 albums on Pure Noise Records (Dancer, and an official reissue of Baby). WP:NBAND.5 says a band may be notable if it Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable). This is the case for Pure Noise Records. —siro χ o 02:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.