Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boris Gorbunov
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Boris Gorbunov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nauseatingly promotional, bought-and-paid-for biography of a commercial scientist. The subject does not pass WP:PROF: he doesn't hold an academic position; the number of citations to his work is modest; and none of the societies mentioned in the article are selective or prestigious. No indication of meeting the WP:GNG either. – Joe (talk) 08:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, basically per nom. A promotional paid biography. Citability data for the subject in GScholar is fairly modest, and there is nothing else in the record to indicate passing WP:PROF on other grounds. Nsk92 (talk) 11:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of exceptional (or even borderline) prominence that could pass WP:PROF and/or make up for the promotionalism. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I think the nomination and the above !votes have it pretty much right. XOR'easter (talk) 19:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete given the evidice presented Legacypac (talk) 10:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.