Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boom Squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boom Squad[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Boom Squad" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

No evidence of any notability which is hardly surprising for a game yet to be released. No independent sources. Way, way too soon for this article. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks like WP:PROMO. In any case, no reliable secondary in-depth sources for WP:GNG, like WP:VG/RS. As per nom, WP:TOOSOON. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 22:43, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not enough evidence of notability. WP:TOOSOON. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Certainly WP:TooSoon - NsTaGaTr ^(Talk) 20:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the only reference given for this article is this game's website, meaning that this article relies too much on primary sources. If one goes to the game's website, one will see that the game will not be released until early November. I am willing to change this contribution to a Keep if this game attracts more media attention after it has been released. However, I think that for the time being, it is better to wait and see what notice this game attracts before having its entry in Wikipedia. Vorbee (talk) 09:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.