Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Book of Sin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 12:48, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Book of Sin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A specific item in a video game would probably not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; if this item is unusually notable, no reliable sources are cited which would confirm that. Prod removed by creator without the addition of reliable sources. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't see how one item from a game that hasn't achieved the notability of (for example) Mario is notable. It might merit a place in the game's article, but no other artefact is listed there yet. No independent references. This belongs on the BoI site at Wikia, not here. Peridon (talk) 12:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – WP:GAMECRUFT advises against articles on individual items from video games, unless by themselves notable. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 13:50, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources available to establish notability per the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 00:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not-notable whatsoever. WP:GAMECRUFT. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:28, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. AutomaticStrikeout 01:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete as WP:GAMECRUFT. Even with sources, this would hardly need a separate article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.