Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonnie Langford Now (Selections From Her One Woman Show Live and Direct)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, given there are no reliable sources. The main author has vanished, and there isnot much sense to userfy, though if someone wants to work on the article, any administrator including e can restore and userfy it.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonnie Langford Now (Selections From Her One Woman Show Live and Direct)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album lacks independent coverage in reliable sources. Lack reviews, charting, awards. Only references are shops and a discogs listing. A search found no good sources to show notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. While there's a lot of coverage of other aspects of her career, I can't find much about this album: no detailed reviews, just mentions in more general articles about her performance in a revival of 9 To 5, etc. The title doesn't fit usual titling policy, which is to not include subtitles like "Selections From Her One Woman Show Live and Direct", so I don't think a redirect is necessary. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:39, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the fact that this is a new article created by a newbie editor who needs time to learn the ropes and improve the article as well as his editing skills until I learn I invoke Wikipedia:Ignore all rules Robcamstone (talk) 22:34, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete That sounds like a good reason to Userfy (although the author has apparently vanished), but ~~I'm not sure someone who's been editing for a year and a half can be considered a newbie~~ still the album is not notable as noted above. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.