Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boneless meat (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Meat on the bone. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boneless meat[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As can be seen from the sparce content, this article does ot contribute anything new; some of the information is opinion or even so obvious that it does not require inclusion ("not require eating around or carving around the bone"). Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think a merge with Meat on the bone may be appropriate to show the comparison of the cuts and other considerations. Reywas92^Talk 14:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ArcAngel (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, opinion backed up by low-quality sources, provides very little information. Don't see any justification for it having its own article. GraziePrego (talk) 04:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge with meat on the bone. The article doesn't have enough significance on its own to warrant an article. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 00:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Still a DICDEF, same as it was almost a year ago. Oaktree b (talk) 00:55, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with meat on the bone. It's only a small amount of information, but it could be useful for comparison within the 'meat on the bone' article. -- Primium (talk) 02:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Britannica has an entry on deboning at https://www.britannica.com/topic/deboning (although its more of a disambiguation page). If one looks in google books and searches for "deboning" there are large number of sources discussing this as a concept directly and in detail. I think it would be possible to cover the topic of "boneless meat" through an article on deboning because that concept would easily pass WP:SIGCOV. However, it's not something I am interested in tackling. Ideally this article should be moved to deboning and updated to reflect that change.4meter4 (talk) 15:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.