Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boneheads (TV series)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Easy peasy. SNOW consensus to delete (speedily). Let's hope that this walled garden is utterly razed now. Drmies (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Boneheads (TV series)[edit]
- Boneheads (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Pilot (Boneheads) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Hadley Hudson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
...apparently this is part of a truly massive hoax campaign created by User:KuhnstylePro, both on Wikipedia and off (the "series" has its on Wikia, but....precisely zero news hits for the series+Disney Channel+the supposed creator. As far as I can tell this has been entirely WP:MADEUP, and doesn't exist at all beyond the "presence" KuhnstylePro has created for it. I'd simply tag the whole thing for G3, but given its spread, thought I'd put it here just in case I'm wrong (which I'd be really happy to be wrong about, but...I have very little doubt this is hoaxin'.) The Bushranger One ping only 05:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that apparently there really is a Hadley Hudson, who does, indeed, work in animation, but the content of his page here appears to be entirely part of the WP:HOAX. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all - I'm kinda skeptical about !voting to delete Hudson, but his page just seems to be part of the hoax. Per nom, I'm pretty sure the show a hoax, regardless, though should this source (from the main page) be considered trustworthy? Regardless, still definitely hoaxy. ZappaOMati 05:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Things like that indicate there's just enough truth at the core of the hoax to be curious (there apparently really was a short called "Bone Heads" in Random! Cartoons in 2008, for instance, although the now-indef'd Kuhnstyle changed its creator to Hudson...). Apparently that simple pair of facts (a Frederator short called "Bone Heads", and the existence of animator Hudson) were used as the basis for the creation of this hoax. Also, the part on Hudson's page about Wendy Yu? Unverifiable and apparently another hoax. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- See also: category and template. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. We can't trust anything written by this user, and anything notable here will likely be rewritten by someone trustworthy. Nyttend (talk) 06:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all - Unverifiable, and a hoax. 'Nuff said. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per the above. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per above - and good block. — Ched : ? 12:56, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I see no harm in speedy delete as a hoax. GiantSnowman 13:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all Amazing hoax. Capitalismojo (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete all The TV series is blatantly bogus. I see a variety of Hadley Hudsons, which already makes me nervous: it's hard to imagine it's that common of a name, and I have to suspect that much or perhaps all of it represents hoaxing beyond our site. Mangoe (talk) 13:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.