Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bone the Fish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bone the Fish

Either a Non-notable neologism or non-notable web content or both. The Washington Post reference (the only reliable source doesn't actually have the word "bone" in in it.

As far as I can tell, it looks like jumptheshark.com got sold to TV Guide, so the people who ran the website made bonethifish.com, thus the creation of the term. kelapstick (talk) 20:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a reliable article?

http://mikehernalsteen.com/blog/social-media/bone-the-fish-the-new-jump-the-shark/

Kb3777 (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The website has only been around for about a month and I couldn't find any third party reliable sources talking about it. I don't think the blog link above qualifies as a reliable source since the author doesn't appear to be an established expert on the topic. Laurent (talk) 11:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neologism based on a single event. 9Nak (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.