Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bon Wen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bon Wen[edit]

Recreated article afte it got deleted as a prod. No notability established, no external references, a bordercase of WP:MADEUP. Tone 14:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per wp:v. -- Jeandré, 2009-04-19t14:48z
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 14:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:G4; it's the same (basically) as it was the last time it was deleted. Cheers. I'^mperator 14:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. — Jake Wartenberg 15:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of independent sources provided. Speedy delete does not apply; this article has never gone through AfD before. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as Recreation of deleted material. Cnilep (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G4 applies to article that were deleted in AfD discussion. This one was a PROD, so I am bringing it here now. --Tone 20:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake; I guess I wasn't paying attention. Make that Delete per nom. Cnilep (talk) 14:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.