Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bompton Had a Dream

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bompton Had a Dream[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD with no reason given. There is an obvious COI issue here in that the article creator appears to be the producer but, that aside, I think the article fails all applicable guidelines anyway.

Concern was Fails WP:NFILM; no reviews or significant coverage in WP:RS Spiderone 10:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very poor referencing, 5 on Youtube that nobody is watching, several casting calls, company profile pages, announcements and interviews that are dependent sources. Nothing independent, not in-depth. scope_creep^Talk 10:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In addition, I could not find even one review for this film (unless tweets now count as reviews, which they probably will the way this world's going) Spiderone 17:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.