Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BollySpice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BollySpice[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating this article for deletion because it doesn't quality per WP:NOTABILITY and WP:WEB. The website has not received specific coverage from independent, notable third party sources or newspapers. Its content has not won a well-known and independent award, and is not distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators. Scieberking (talk) 04:53, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Scieberking (talk) 05:02, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found zero significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 23:12, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.