Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollocks to Alton Towers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn - sufficient reviews found. (non-admin closure) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:42, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bollocks to Alton Towers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any non-crowd-sourced reviews of this book (although there is a single one for the sequel [1]), and none of the other WP:NBOOK criteria seem applicable. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Appears to be a non-notable book. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Non-notable. -CoronaEditor (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Times has a review(https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bollocks-to-alton-towers-glxcxcwff63), it's likely that others exist. It's possible that because of the title, coverage is not as easy to find - https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/7864752.funny-how-time-drips-away/ is not much of a review, but is an example of how the title may be written. Peter James (talk) 18:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. Good job there. I think these two would actually suffice already. That cutesy "B*llocks" spelling clearly didn't helped in searching... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found another couple shorty reviews - Telegraph,Independent.@Lugnuts and CoronaEditor: what do you think? What with the Times and Press reviews (the latter a little lightweight, but whatevs) - I think that might cover the minimum requirements. Minded to withdraw if you guys agree. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THanks for the ping. Yes, they look fine to me, esp. the review in The Times. Have struck-out my delete vote. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right ho. Withdrawing. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 01:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.