Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollmanize
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete - two of us think it is an attack page. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bollmanize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I'm listing this for deletion it seems to be essentially a dictionary definition of an obscure neologism. A Google search brought back zero results (not that that is in itself a sufficient test), and it doesn't appear in any of the dictionaries I have access to. If the description is true, it seems like it should be easy to source and/or provide an etymology, but there is neither in the article as of this listing. My only guesses as to what this really is are speculative and fail to assume good faith, so I'll leave it at that. Mycroft7 (talk) 18:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:NFT --T-rex 19:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable neologism and dicdef. JuJube (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. In addition to the above, this seems like a thinly veiled attack page against someone named Bollman. Were that any clearer, I'd recommend a G10 speedy. AnturiaethwrTalk 19:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.