Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bojo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bojo

Species does not exist. Genus does not exists. Hoax. Joelito 01:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. PJM 01:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Green Giant 01:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. —Eternal Equinox | talk 01:43, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, tee hee! Funny hoax. -- Samir ∙ ^T_C 01:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. --Allen 01:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, BJAODN unworthy hoax. Royboy crashfan 02:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails the google test. — ApolloCreed ^{(comment) (talk)} 03:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. If it's supposed to be funny, I don't get it. dbtfz ^talk 08:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-06 08:43Z
Delete as hoax. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Jude(talk,contribs)
Delete hoax. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha269 (talk • contribs)
Delete as hoax. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per well argued nomination. ε γκυκλοπαίδεια* 21:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, WP:HOAX. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 19:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, hoax. incog 21:22, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.