Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bojan Janković

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Keep votes don't seem to be heavily based on policy/guidelines and did not effectively refute the assertion by the deletionist comments that the subject failed GNG and NHOCKEY. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bojan Janković[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is another page for Bogdan Janković. Primefac (talk) 20:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 21:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 21:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 21:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet GNG or NHOCKEY.18abruce (talk) 22:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep player is listed on eliteprospects ice hockey database with full bio other info. link: http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=40973 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurohockisupreme (talk • contribs) 12:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a reason to Keep, that is purely routine coverage, which does nothing to establish notability.18abruce (talk) 00:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is a reason to keep. Guy played for his National team multiple times, played in top level in Slovenian league "Slohokej". For me thats more than enough...compared to me and you who sit in chair and comment he represeted his county...enough to for notability my friend! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.250.35.162 (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still absolutely irrelevent to the discussion, but if you are proud of him that is good. WP:NHOCKEY is for players who play in leagues who are likely to get extensive coverage, or for national team players who play at the top level. He satisfies neither.18abruce (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss whether it can be verified that he played for the national team
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: For what purpose? It is clear from various databases that he played for his national team, but that is irrelevent. Either GNG needs to be verified (good luck), or NHOCKEY (which is a clear no).18abruce (talk) 17:29, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete complete GNG fail and they never played at any level to get anywhere near meeting NHOCKEY. Deadman137 (talk) 04:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The once source provided is an interview from the local coverage after winning a low-level league championship, the very definition of routine coverage and suitable for indicating notability for GNG. Other searches turned up much the same (but I will admit my Serbian is not exactly perfect for such a thing). Definitely fails NHOCKEY, playing for the national team does not matter unless it is for the world championship (top-level only), not a world championship (Div. I, Div II, etc.) which is just for promotion/relegation purposes. Yosemiter (talk) 15:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep judging on previous comments I have to say...didnt play top division? are you guys serious? check nhockey rules...plus he played top level slovenian championship (and yes slovenia does play olypmics) and won title...plus multiple champinoships for his national team. But it seems that community think its irrelevent...hahaha to me it looks like this serbian sportsman is being under discrimination...bad bad and very sad

Hello single purpose IP, please provide sources for your assertion of notability. This player never played in the Olympics nor the top level of the Ice Hockey World Championships (the only level that plays for The World Championship). Playing against players (such as Slovenians) that have made the Olympics does not make someone notable. (I can play rec-league game against a notable NHL player, but that does not make me notable). Yosemiter (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.