Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bohemia (group)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Willing to userfy or redirect on request. Nakon 02:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bohemia (group)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Untrue information. Marta Jandová and Václav Noid Bárta will represent the Czech Republic at the Eurovision Song Contest 2015, but they never formed a group called "Bohemia". The page cites no sources and is orphaned as well. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have no view on the question of notability but there are plenty of sources that link these two together as Bohemia, eg [1], [2], [3] and many more that can be found with a Google search. Just Chilling (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But are these reliable sources? The official Eurovision website lists them as "Marta Jandová & Václav Noid Bárta" as do other reliable sources such as Eurovoix, Esctoday, and Wiwibloggs. As for your third source, it never calls them "Bohemia" except for an unrelated YouTube video they linked. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per the fact that there is no current information of this group. It fails notability standards.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Of those sources that @Just Chilling: linked to, OGAE is reliable, as is EurovisionTimes. The third, I'm not sure and have never come across the website before. Although that doesn't mean they are unreliable. However with that in mind, and seeing as we have conflicting information on various reliable Eurovision-related websites - then I would be inclined to say redirect to Czech Republic in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015; and in the event that Eurovision.tv confirm the group name, then undo the redirect and build up the article accordingly. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 11:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re-direct to Czech Republic in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015 – Per Wesley Mouse (talk · contribs). There is too much uncertainty at the minute and it isn't really clear if this group justifies an article beyond the standard Eurovision one. A re-direct seems appropriate for now. CT Cooper · talk 13:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- If ever the article should be deleted, it would be better to redirect it to their song page "Hope Never Dies" rather than Czech Republic in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015. werldwayd (talk) 19:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Someone searching for the group would not expect to be redirected to their song. As the duo were internally select to represent the Czech Republic in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015, then a redirect there would be more logical. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 19:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. All finalist formations that are performing their country's official entry at the Eurovision Song Contest are notable to have their own separate articles in Wikipedia. But there is not enough documentation till now that the official entry will mention Bohemia by name. However regardless of the outcome, there is good argument in renaming it Bohemia (duo) as technically this is not band. To my mind, a band would have three members are least. Two members is called a duo. werldwayd (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.